With these changes and our acquired knowledge we can construct a sustainable vision for testing. So just what is that vision?
Let's make manual testing fun again. As we've ramped up our workloads, we find ourselves repetitively testing the same packages again and again (and running the same tests!). We'd call this regression testing and it's a perfect candidate for automated testing. Let's automate these tests and keep our focus on where we as humans excel.
In addition, we as a community participate in "calls for testing". These calls have become more and more exploratory in nature. In general, we have moved further away from a defined testcase ("perform steps 1, 2, and 3"). Instead, we encourage testers to adopt a try and break it attitude. This is where we as humans can excel, and you know what, have some fun at trying! Remember QA is the only place we encourage you to break things!
So let's get manual testing back to the exploratory testing we love.
Thank you little testing robot! |
In addition, a well written bug report can become an excellent testcase to be added to the application testuite. Let's look at bug reports for potential testcases. We can write the test and then forget it. The little robots will tell us if it becomes a problem again in the future and even prevent the bad code from getting shipped where it can break our machines (again). Not bad little robots!
So let's focus on ensuring tests exist for critical regressions when they get fixed.
Let's tackle some big projects. Who said we can't achieve amazing things in the quality community? This vision would be nothing more than an idea without some actions behind it!
Right now we as a community already have a chance to put these ideas in action. Exploratory testing is happening right now on the phablet devices. Get involved! This is the manual, have fun and try and break it, exploratory testing we all love. Even without a phablet device, regressions can be turned into autopilot tests. This meets our goal to expand our automated tests and to look at bugs as potential sources for those tests.
All test and no play makes for a sad image |
So let's be the leaders for change in ubuntu.
Are you in?
I am in. I prefer the exploratory testing aproach better. The repetitive tests get boring after awhile. This should spark some excitement back into ubuntu testing.
ReplyDeleteSo am I. Exploratory testing sounds great, although we could use a bit of structure. Also, writing automated testcases seems like a great way to write practical code.
ReplyDeleteYou mean "alluded"
ReplyDeleteYou know me ;)
ReplyDelete